Home
> empirical Bayes, gene expression, maximum entropy, preprints, slides > False discovery rates are misleadingly low
False discovery rates are misleadingly low
2 March 2016
DRB
D. R. Bickel, “Correcting false discovery rates for their bias toward false positives,” Working Paper, University of Ottawa, deposited in uO Research at https://goo.gl/GcUjJe (2016). 2016 preprint | Slides: CFDR and RFDR for SSC 2017 & CFDR and RFDR for ICMCM 2018
12 June 2017: URL updated and slides added
6 December 2018: more slides added
Share this:
Related
Categories: empirical Bayes, gene expression, maximum entropy, preprints, slides
Follow me on Twitter
My TweetsNew content
- “A Litany of Problems With p-values”
- How to choose features or p values for empirical Bayes estimation of the local false discovery rate
- R functions for combining probabilities using game theory
- Why adjust priors for the simplicity of data distributions?
- R package for estimating local false discovery rates using empirical Bayes methods
More content
Archives
Emphases
applications welcome complexity empirical Bayes fiducial inference gene expression genetic association imprecise probability maximum entropy MDL metabolomics model checking ontology parameter restriction possibility theory proteomics publications reviews simply explained slides software statistical evidence trainee author
Slideshow
This slideshow requires JavaScript.
